Existence - what is her part and what is not her part?

What does she hold within? On one end there is this posionous fueds taking place all the time between your Mom and Dad. And on the other end, there are flowers blooming. What does she hold within her? It is creating this variety of events. What is between these events>? Are thse events connected at all? Completely differente vents takng place. It seems like a random mess. Ek aur daldal hai aur ek aur phool. Where do these feuds arise from? What are these mirroring? Are these not mirroring someting fundamental that is happening in the existence? At this level there are feuds, what about the deeper levels of existences? Is there a constant battle between the moving and the still? Possibly a part of existance where the moving and the still are constantly at wat. Fighing against each other. Otherwise how will the fight manigest at such giross levels of existence. The impression for the fgihts must be coming from soemwhere. The source should exist. Whitout the see for such fights how will the fights originate at all. In seed form itself, this exists. The fueds, the conflict, the disease, the war. All of this seems to be taking place at subtler levels of existence. In forms less visislbe, in seed forms. And then finding expression in the fgrosser reality,. These do not seem to come out of nowhere. Thre is some source that is contributing to all of this. It does not seem to be coming out of nowhere. It is as present as other things. Not alien. Inherent. A part of existence. Seeing it separate is the problem. WHat makes you think this is someone else’s playu and not aply of the existence? Is this because your idea or your expectation that this existtance can ssatify you is hampered? It is clear. There is no separation. Between these. Why choose to polish the reality, the existance by seeing all this as separate? This is as mch as a part as other things. This filth, this dirt, this halahal, this salivating dog. What makes you think that you can eliminate conflict, corruption, disease, permanently.? Is it a result of your making? working? This existence at a deeper level. A level where you do not exist. You cannot operate from. They are originiating from that. But you can see your lies. Lies that thsi is existing somewhere outside of the current existence. It is coming from an outside force. But all of this, this filth - is also coming from the same source. Flowers on one end and kichad on another. Health on one end and disease on another. All exieting parallely, arising from the same. The same source. There is no separation at source level. What makes you think that there is a separation? That one is no natural? One is not inherent or a part. But a deviation. A deviation that needs to be fixed, what is the devfiation stemming fgrom? Is it from human action, or, somewhere else. Somewhere from where humans themselves arise. It is unseparable part of the existence. If not unseparable, if all this is no unspearable, where do you see the boundary between them? Baeon what you fgeel. Is based on your feelings, is something based on your feelings sufficient to create a spearation , a spearation between this and that within the existence? Between filth and dlowers? In hthe way you experience and feel, the seasons are changing all the time, but that does not make tou see the nature as separate. it is seen as a part of the same nature. what you feel is changing all the time, what you receive from the enviroment and feel. is changing all the time. does that separate the existence endlessly? what is experieinced at one level , at one second is different from the other. does that make one second different, separate from the other/.? The divisions are endless. IF what you feel is taken as the basis of separateness then, the devisions are endless. they are as minute as the minutest of activity that takes place weithin you. so every second there is a dvision. scientist, femto chemistry and isrt finding by Ahmed Zeqwali that measure times at a deeper level, that mesaure seeper changes shows something eelse. the existence is separate at mnore deeper levels. at how mnayu levels will the existence then be separate?> going on deviding into parts. branching out. at every deeper level, it is brandcing out furtherm it is dividing. where is the unity then?> if feeling is the basis, there is devision everywhere. division only exists, there is no unity. whta about higher levels? higher levels? higher levels based on what? based on what you feel? can what you feel in a entire yuear, in an entiner year be encapsulated into one point? and then this one point forms a referencepoint, and then existence branches out or is seen as separate based upon on this. so for higher units of experience and abstraction the union is different in the existence. ten year cycle is different from 20 year cycle. so thre is unity. but there is speculation here, because can the existence and its experience for longer perios bne encapsulated into one single point? one single emotion. and then it adds up,. how long can this continue?> will things not end at death? will death be an end to this continuum? what is dying? you die. your body dies, and everuthing persished., but where do you being. is everything that you see apart of you formed when you are born? does it not exist in a different form before your birth? food exists in a different form, it changes form. and then it becomes ashes. forms are changing, but it is not clear if things are being sdestroyed fully or not. they do not seem to be destroyed., there is a change, a transofmration, thre is a continuum perhaps with different levels of transofmration or upheavals, but destriction does not seem likely. wha tthen do you think dies? what is your death? what will makr your death? will death mark a full stop, or it is a transformation. why then older deaths are not recollectible? there is a void, btween birth and before. a bnlank space. but does blanmk space always denote nothing? the mind when asbored in something appears bnlank, but deep down it is so engroseed in the same thing that it appears balank, but in reality oething is happening. something which starts becoming known and familiar a commonplace. Since it is happiening for long, this tarts becoming knonwn ad common. Something that is natural. Still. But when this is broken, when this flow is broken, there is a shift. so the blank space before birth befire your beginning is also forming the fundamentals of what you are experiencing. it could bel something that is coloring your experience since so long that it is almost unidistinghuisable, it does not seem as a happening. it seems as if it is existing all along. it is there. not an ahappening. but there, . always there. how then can this be knonw? so that the continuum can be seemn. so that one can see that there is no permananet end, but just some transformations happening all the time? so that death is not seen as a full stop, but a point of transition. a comma , not a full stop. without this, can larger unit of the existence be known? what will need to be done to see the larger unity within existance? what is the unity being looked at? What for? there os dal;dal and halahal, how will seeing them as one resolve thinggs? will it make the experieince of the w oerld better? will seeing that they both arise from the same thing, obkectively help you ? will things become better by seeing this unity? This might happen given the ne eatures of the car. However, things that can improve te qaulity of life. there is money, money can be used fto biu clother. Like you sisshby hiw she is foin a varity of thins to ensure that thre is datisfaction. to ensure that her satifaction is not hapmered she is taking many measures. theunhity that you see the continuum that you see, hoiw will this eliminate the toxicirtyt of halahal? will seeing the inity eliminate the halahal and the toxicity? advoate ntoice is the threat that is he having to give to wake them up and get things done. whether he is impatient of there are sleeping is unknown. what to expand upon this? whether we are sleeping or the exsitence is unfari./ it a question that persists. uos ex[aatopm frp, tje mew ar dpes mpt see, tp jabe ,atcjed/ je tjpigjt je wo;; receove sp,etjomg frp, tje car. nit tjat ja,[ered/ tje mew cdar jas a;sp fao;ed tp gove jo, tje ex[eroemce je was aslomg fpr/ tje mew sjomu tjomg dfo;s tp gove tje ex[eroeomce ot [rp,osses ot a;waus fa;;s sprt/ for youi too/ are tje mew sjomu tjomgs mpt ise;ess tjem wju nptjer apit tje,? wju ne after mew sjimu tjomgs as ,sicj? wajt e;se cam pme ne after? Temples adn visiting temples? there is a map and the car exists alone in the blank spot, there is no camera. it exists as an arrow in the map. in the fgith map, a red color arrow. wat are other scuh presentations tou you>? how are you represented at a deeoer kegek> pichle janam ke karam hai jo bhagatna pa raha hai yueh sab, sunna pad raha hai inzaam jo kiya hi nahi. oechle janama mein hua. juske jkaarm aise mila. phir bnhi yeh nahi deekh rahin hai kio pichle janam ka kaam tumne hi kiya tha. yadi isko sach manein to ocle jaan wstyjj yt us bit ckear, tgat tgere us sientubg tgat sge dudm tgat us resykted, sge us tukk tgubjubg tgat sge us veubg syvheted ti tgus m as uf sge us tge giid ibe abd vad firces are actubg yoib gre, gere giidbess stukk renaubs ybsuyoted, tgus us bit seeb as a treatnebt fir ab aukenbt, sgw sats this us a treatment vut fir wgise auknebt sge dies bit, sge us ksukebt gere, Sge yses te oiast ti see itgers as a oribken, kuje ytiy abd gyum, kuje yiy abd ytiy dad, tiy gace bit guveb ytiy gurt fir wasg desoute reoeated reqyestsm tgus us ebiygg tgsu us seeb as a reasib ti ve dibe wutg yiy, abd yiy dad, sge wabts a vreaj, ut break froim what>? where did this jounrey begin? were you present in the joutney at the beginning too? how are you the cause of this tiredness did you start along with here> were tou present with here during the beguinning? not reallt. not possible. she is edisting much before ou ddi. so this jorney is not a new. it is an old one. the car showrom owner calls, and the is melodios. soft. . this new xar is also not giving enough. there are parts of this because there is nuisance.l